SELECT data_key, data_value
FROM xf_data_registry
WHERE data_key IN ('options', 'languages', 'contentTypes', 'codeEventListeners', 'deferredRun', 'simpleCache', 'addOns', 'defaultStyleProperties', 'routeFiltersIn', 'routeFiltersOut', 'routesPublic', 'nodeTypes', 'bannedIps', 'discouragedIps', 'styles', 'displayStyles', 'userBanners', 'smilies', 'bbCode', 'threadPrefixes', 'userTitleLadder', 'reportCounts', 'moderationCounts', 'userModerationCounts', 'notices', 'userFieldsInfo')
Run Time: 0.000670
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | xf_data_registry | range | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 27 | | 26 | Using where |
SELECT data_key, data_value
FROM xf_data_registry
WHERE data_key IN ('brListenerClasses', 'brBriviumAddOns')
Run Time: 0.000143
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | xf_data_registry | range | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 27 | | 2 | Using where |
SELECT *
FROM xf_brivium_addon
ORDER BY addon_id
Run Time: 0.000148
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | xf_brivium_addon | index | | PRIMARY | 77 | | 1 | |
INSERT INTO xf_data_registry
(data_key, data_value)
VALUES
(?, ?)
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
data_value = VALUES(data_value)
Params: brBriviumAddOns, a:0:{}
Run Time: 0.000148
SELECT session_data
FROM xf_session
WHERE session_id = ?
AND expiry_date >= ?
Params: 3a74d3ef37f1c31bc0529abf7e841f5b, 1716169878
Run Time: 0.000178
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | xf_session | const | PRIMARY,expiry_date | PRIMARY | 34 | const | 1 | |
SELECT cache_value
FROM xf_permission_combination
WHERE permission_combination_id = ?
Params: 1
Run Time: 0.000162
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | xf_permission_combination | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | |
SELECT thread.*
,
user.gender, user.avatar_date, user.gravatar,
NULL AS thread_read_date,
0 AS thread_reply_banned,
0 AS thread_is_watched,
'' AS draft_message, NULL AS draft_extra
FROM xf_thread AS thread
LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
(user.user_id = thread.user_id)
WHERE thread.thread_id = ?
Params: 371718
Run Time: 0.000726
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | thread | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | |
SIMPLE | user | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | |
SELECT node.*, forum.*
,
permission.cache_value AS node_permission_cache,
NULL AS forum_read_date
FROM xf_forum AS forum
INNER JOIN xf_node AS node ON (node.node_id = forum.node_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_permission_cache_content AS permission
ON (permission.permission_combination_id = 1
AND permission.content_type = 'node'
AND permission.content_id = forum.node_id)
WHERE node.node_id = ?
Params: 25
Run Time: 0.000725
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | forum | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | |
SIMPLE | node | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | |
SIMPLE | permission | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 35 | const,const,const | 1 | |
SELECT post.*
,
thread.*, thread.user_id AS thread_user_id, thread.username AS thread_username,
thread.post_date AS thread_post_date,
post.user_id, post.username, post.post_date,
bb_code_parse_cache.parse_tree AS message_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS message_cache_version,
user.*, IF(user.username IS NULL, post.username, user.username) AS username,
user_profile.*,
user_privacy.*,
signature_parse_cache.parse_tree AS signature_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS signature_cache_version,
session_activity.view_date AS last_view_date,
0 AS like_date
FROM xf_post AS post
INNER JOIN xf_thread AS thread ON
(thread.thread_id = post.thread_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS bb_code_parse_cache ON
(bb_code_parse_cache.content_type = 'post' AND bb_code_parse_cache.content_id = post.post_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
(user.user_id = post.user_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_user_profile AS user_profile ON
(user_profile.user_id = post.user_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_user_privacy AS user_privacy ON
(user_privacy.user_id = post.user_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS signature_parse_cache ON
(signature_parse_cache.content_type = 'signature' AND signature_parse_cache.content_id = post.user_id)
LEFT JOIN xf_session_activity AS session_activity ON
(post.user_id > 0 AND session_activity.user_id = post.user_id AND session_activity.unique_key = CAST(post.user_id AS BINARY))
WHERE (
(post.thread_id = ? AND (post.position >= 0 AND post.position < 10) )
)
AND (post.message_state IN ('visible'))
ORDER BY post.position ASC, post.post_date ASC
Params: 371718
Run Time: 0.002881
Select Type | Table | Type | Possible Keys | Key | Key Len | Ref | Rows | Extra |
---|
SIMPLE | thread | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | const | 1 | Using filesort |
SIMPLE | post | ref | thread_id_post_date,thread_id_position | thread_id_post_date | 4 | const | 1 | Using index condition; Using where |
SIMPLE | bb_code_parse_cache | eq_ref | content_type_id | content_type_id | 31 | const,xenforo.cc.post.post_id | 1 | Using where |
SIMPLE | user | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | xenforo.cc.post.user_id | 1 | |
SIMPLE | user_profile | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | xenforo.cc.post.user_id | 1 | |
SIMPLE | user_privacy | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | xenforo.cc.post.user_id | 1 | |
SIMPLE | signature_parse_cache | eq_ref | content_type_id | content_type_id | 31 | const,xenforo.cc.post.user_id | 1 | Using where |
SIMPLE | session_activity | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 22 | xenforo.cc.post.user_id,func | 1 | Using where |
INSERT INTO xf_thread_view
(thread_id)
VALUES
(?)
Params: 371718
Run Time: 0.000102
UPDATE `xf_session` SET `expiry_date` = ? WHERE (session_id = '3a74d3ef37f1c31bc0529abf7e841f5b')
Params: 1716173478
Run Time: 0.001016
INSERT INTO xf_session_activity
(user_id, unique_key, ip, controller_name, controller_action, view_state, params, view_date, robot_key)
VALUES
(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
ip = VALUES(ip),
controller_name = VALUES(controller_name),
controller_action = VALUES(controller_action),
view_state = VALUES(view_state),
params = VALUES(params),
view_date = VALUES(view_date),
robot_key = VALUES(robot_key)
Params: 0, , , XenForo_ControllerPublic_Thread, Index, valid, thread_id=371718, 1716169878,
Run Time: 0.000125
INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
Params: post, 378354, a:6:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:1:"b";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:3:"[B]";i:1;s:4:"[/B]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:149:"Facebook正准备就App Store政策和即将推出的iOS 14隐私功能对苹果提起反垄断诉讼,不过提起诉讼的计划还没有确定。";}}i:1;s:263:"根据The Information的最新报道,这家社交媒体巨头一直在寻求外部法律顾问的协助以进行申诉,将指控苹果 "滥用其在智能手机市场的权力,强迫应用开发者遵守苹果自家应用不必遵守的App Store规则"。
";i:2;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";s:66:"https://static.cnbetacdn.com/article/2021/0128/76fc98de0c936d3.jpg";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:74:"[URL='https://static.cnbetacdn.com/article/2021/0128/76fc98de0c936d3.jpg']";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"img";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[IMG]";i:1;s:6:"[/IMG]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:96:"https://rdimg.com/proxy/https://static.cnbetacdn.com/thumb/article/2021/0128/76fc98de0c936d3.jpg";}}}}i:3;s:26:"
尽管该诉讼代表着";i:4;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";s:90:"https://apple.pvxt.net/c/1251234/435400/7639?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apple.com%2Fcn%2Fmusic%2F";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:98:"[URL='https://apple.pvxt.net/c/1251234/435400/7639?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apple.com%2Fcn%2Fmusic%2F']";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:6:"苹果";}}i:5;s:2253:"与Facebook之间关系恶化的重大升级,但知情人士表示,Facebook最终可能决定不提起诉讼。有消息称,Facebook正面临着员工对与这家库比蒂诺科技巨头的高调之战的 "内部阻力"。
报道称,这场诉讼的焦点在于即将进行的一项变革,该变革将使某种类型的用户提供一种追踪标签,以明确其是否选择加入。2020年,Facebook发起了一场反对隐私功能的运动,声称它可能会减少广告收入,并伤害小企业。这家社交媒体巨头可能会在诉讼中寻求金钱赔偿,但投诉的一个更重要的目标是改变苹果的App Store和开发者指南。
Facebook已经考虑将其它公司也纳入诉讼范围。这也不是Facebook第一次表现出在法庭上与苹果对抗的意愿。12月,它表示将出示内部文件,以协助Epic Games与苹果进行法律斗争。
在大多数情况下,苹果和Facebook多年来一直互不相让。但过去两家公司在处理用户数据和隐私方面的紧张关系已经爆发。蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)一直批评Facebook对消费者数据处理不当,而Facebook则针对苹果的侵犯各方利益的行为展开批评。这些紧张关系随着广告商身份标识(IDFA)标签的计划变化而升级,苹果在2020年宣布了这一计划,但推迟到2021年,以便给开发者更多的时间来准备。
Facebook在2020年底加大了对该功能的反对力度,在报纸上刊登整版广告和应用内提示,告知企业用户其收入可能会受到影响。尽管如此,1月早些时候,Facebook表示,它将 "别无选择",只能遵守这一变化。
有一些迹象表明,即使是Facebook的员工也对这场备受瞩目的尘事感到担忧。12月,一份报告显示,这家社交媒体巨头的一些员工表示担心,Facebook的攻击可能被视为利己,而不是为了小企业的利益。
虽然Facebook和其他依赖广告的组织对这一功能表示担忧,但数字权利和隐私组织却对苹果的这一功能表示赞扬。尽管受到批评,但苹果表示,它仍然致力于这项隐私功能。周三,该公司宣布,反追踪功能将在春季推出之前的下一个iOS测试版中到来。";}, 1621686945, 1716169878
Run Time: 0.001082